Skip to main content
· 5/6/1929

Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. Jett

Citations

  • 32 F.2d 976
  • 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3932

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the applicable standard here is whether [the employer] knew or should have known of the violative condition—not whether the behavior that led to the violation was foreseeable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.