Skip to main content
· 2/4/1926

Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Newman

Citations

  • 11 F.2d 277
  • 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “This deferential standard of review is necessary to protect the district court’s ‘superior understanding of the litigation and the desirability of avoiding frequent appellate review of what essentially are factual matters.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.