Skip to main content
· 9/25/1926

Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Harrelson

Citations

  • 14 F.2d 893
  • 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, “[l]ike Bernalillo County’s seal [at issue in Friedman ], and the seals of Zion and Rolling Meadows [at issue in Harris], the cross is a prominent feature of the Edmond seal.”
  • rejecting defendants’ argument that “the City seal is permissible because it symbolizes ‘the unique history and heritage of Edmond’ ”
  • “Standing is of course always necessary in an Establishment Clause case, and it is sometimes a difficult issue.”
  • applying the test derived from Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971)
  • “The circular seal contains four quadrants, of which [three depict secular symbols] ... and the last quadrant depicts a Christian cross.”
  • challenge to City of Edmond, Oklahoma’s official seal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kenyon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.