Skip to main content
· 10/4/1930

Chicago Joint Stock Land Bank v. McCambridge

Citations

  • 258 Ill. App. 574
  • 1930 Ill. App. LEXIS 609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an appellate court may review a second motion for directed verdict in view of all the evidence
  • “Where a defendant makes a motion at the close of plaintiff’s case for a directed verdict, if he desires to save his point, he must introduce no evidence. But if he puts in his evidence and desires a directed verdict, he must make a second motion for a directed verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.