Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that statements of alleged agents are not sufficient evidence of authority to accept process
• \ '[n]o showing of merits is necessary in support of a motion to vacate a void judgment' \
• ”‘[n]o showing of merits is necessary in support of a motion to vacate a void judgment' ’’
• attorney representing client in one matter is not an agent of client for service of process in different matter
• statements of alleged agent are not sufficient evidence of authority to accept process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).