Skip to main content
· 4/27/1905

Chicago Grain Door Co. v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.

Citations

  • 137 F. 101
  • 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 5205

Syllabus

<p>Patents—Suit fob infringement—Supplemental Bill Covering New Infringements.</p> <p>Where the defendant, pending a suit for infringement of a patent, begins the use of another alleged infringing device, separate and distinct from that complained of in the bill, although such fact does not render the suit defective, within the meaning of equity rule 57, but constitutes ground for an independent suit, the court may nevertheless, in the interest of saving delay and expense by the needless duplication of proofs, permit the question of the second infringement to be brought into the case by á supplemental bill.</p>

Judges: Sanborn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.