Skip to main content
· 11/21/1899

Chicago & E. I. R. R. v. Moran

Citations

  • 85 Ill. App. 543
  • 1898 Ill. App. LEXIS 1082

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no new trial granted where defendant approached juror and asked “what he thought of the case, or if it was not a singular case” because evidence showed defendant did not remember person was a juror and that he promptly stopped talking upon learning person was juror

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.