Skip to main content
· 3/2/1987

Chicago Commodities, Inc. Rosenthal & Company Diana Watt, Donald W. Adams v. Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Charles L. Dick Wilma Dick

Citations

  • 811 F.2d 1262
  • 7 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 485
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 2672
  • 55 U.S.L.W. 2512

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The plain meaning of the language in [ § 18(e) ] supports our conclusion that the bond requirement is jurisdictional.\
  • \[The Act] was modeled after PACA. The bond requirements in the two statutes are identical. The legislative history of PACA unequivocally indicates that the bond requirement is jurisdictional.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Farris, Beezer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.