Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prior to a grant of leave to file \there must be at least prima facie showing that the movant can marshal support for the new matters sought to be pleaded\
• reviewing for an abuse of discretion a lower court's ruling on a motion for leave to amend a pleading
• reviewing for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to amend a pleading beyond the time limit established for amendment of right
• “[W]here a plaintiff fails to make a prima facie showing of support for new matters sought to be pleaded, a trial court acts within its discretion to deny a motion to amend the pleading.”
• “[W]here a plaintiff fails to make a prima facie showing of support for new matters sought to be pleaded, a trial court acts within its discretion to deny a motion to amend the pleading.”
• “[W]here a plaintiff fails to make a prima facie showing of 28 PICKAWAY, 21CA7 support for new matters sought to be pleaded, a trial court acts within its discretion to deny a motion to amend the pleading.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).