Chicago Bonding & Surety Co. v. Augusta-Savannah Nav. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “defendant has not infringed plaintiff’s copyright,” and that “because plaintiff’s card is primarily intended to be used to carry out a lottery, he can not have relief in a court of equi- ty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).