· 3/2/1943
Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. North Kansas City Development Co.
Citations
- 134 F.2d 142
- 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 4266
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the motion for summary enforcement sought the return of documents and requested that the district court hold the breaching party in contempt
- “Relief from a final judgment under Rule 60(b) is an ‘extraordinary remedy that is granted only in exceptional circumstances.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnsen, Sanborn, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.