Skip to main content
· 3/2/1943

Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. North Kansas City Development Co.

Citations

  • 134 F.2d 142
  • 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 4266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the motion for summary enforcement sought the return of documents and requested that the district court hold the breaching party in contempt
  • “Relief from a final judgment under Rule 60(b) is an ‘extraordinary remedy that is granted only in exceptional circumstances.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnsen, Sanborn, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.