Skip to main content
· 8/23/1988

Chicago and North Western Transportation Co., Frvr Corporation, and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Railway Labor Executives Association

Citations

  • 855 F.2d 1277
  • 129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2216
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11703
  • 1988 WL 87499

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[The court’s] role is limited to determining whether the dispute can be characterized as involving the proper application or meaning of a contract provision.”
  • legal remedies available from the Board are adequate to make prevailing party whole
  • “[W]e conclude that the district court correctly determined that because the present controversy is a minor dispute under the RLA, it is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the [adjustment board], and must be resolved under the Act’s § 3 RLA procedures.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Kanne, Eschbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.