Skip to main content
· 1/8/1887

Chicago & Alton R. R. v. Stites

Citations

  • 20 Ill. App. 648
  • 1886 Ill. App. LEXIS 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court’s dismissal of pro se litigant’s case 20 where the litigant continued to file “frivolous and duplicative motions” that “needlessly disrupted 21 the litigation and burdened the court and opposing counsel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.