Cheyenne Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of continuance to conduct discovery because the materials sought “would not demonstrate abandonment of the United States’ interest in the land”
• affirming denial of jurisdictional discovery where “[t]he Tribes failed to specify how the requested discovery would alter the court’s determination that the statute of limitations had long since run and extinguished their claim.”
• “conclusory assertions about the potential value of discovery are insufficient unless supported by specific discoverable facts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).