· 11/21/2013
Chey v. Orbitz Worldwide, Inc.
Citations
- 983 F. Supp. 2d 1219
- 2013 WL 6145661
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165581
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- certifying a class of individuals who made payments to obtain repossessed cars relied on representations in standard form regarding repossession/sale process
- named plaintiff’s failure to meet class definition not fatal to case; substitution of appropriate plaintiff allowed
- “A court is not bound by the class definition proposed in the complaint.” (cleaned up)
- “A court is not bound by the class definition proposed in the complaint.” (cleaned up)
- “A court is not bound by the class definition proposed in the complaint.” (cleaned up)
- defendants conspired with one another in a “churning” scheme to defraud consumer used-car purchasers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seabright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.