Skip to main content
· 11/21/2013

Chey v. Orbitz Worldwide, Inc.

Citations

  • 983 F. Supp. 2d 1219
  • 2013 WL 6145661
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165581

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • certifying a class of individuals who made payments to obtain repossessed cars relied on representations in standard form regarding repossession/sale process
  • named plaintiff’s failure to meet class definition not fatal to case; substitution of appropriate plaintiff allowed
  • “A court is not bound by the class definition proposed in the complaint.” (cleaned up)
  • “A court is not bound by the class definition proposed in the complaint.” (cleaned up)
  • “A court is not bound by the class definition proposed in the complaint.” (cleaned up)
  • defendants conspired with one another in a “churning” scheme to defraud consumer used-car purchasers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seabright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.