Skip to main content
· 4/12/1977

Chewning v. Huebner

Citations

  • 235 S.E.2d 573
  • 142 Ga. App. 112
  • 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “An existing contract is superseded and discharged whenever the parties subsequently enter upon a valid and inconsistent agreement completely covering the subject matter embraced by the original contract.”
  • borrower entitled to directed verdict on suit to recover usurious interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marshall, Deen, Webb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.