· 4/12/1977
Chewning v. Huebner
Citations
- 235 S.E.2d 573
- 142 Ga. App. 112
- 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1498
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “An existing contract is superseded and discharged whenever the parties subsequently enter upon a valid and inconsistent agreement completely covering the subject matter embraced by the original contract.”
- borrower entitled to directed verdict on suit to recover usurious interest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marshall, Deen, Webb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.