Chew v. Newsome Chevrolet, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating an employer \moved for summary judgment on the ground that the [circuit] court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because Chew was its statutory employee under the South Carolina Workers' Compensation Act\
• wherein the court reversed the trial court’s denial of an employer’s motion for summary judgment where the facts were undisputed that security services were a necessary part of the employer’s general business
• subject matter jurisdiction a question for the court, not the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).