Skip to main content
· 6/15/1832

Chew v. Keene

Citations

  • 4 La. 145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding SEC adequately alleged Section 9(a)(2) violation where complaint alleged manipulative trading activity was “designed to create a false impression of supply or demand for securities and to induce other market participants to purchase or sell securities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.