Skip to main content
· 1/8/1896

Chew v. Glenn

Citations

  • 82 Md. 370
  • 33 A. 722
  • 1896 Md. LEXIS 14

Syllabus

<p>Eqtdty Pleading — Paragraphs of Bill — Multifariousness.</p> <p>The provisions of Code, Art. 16, sec. 131 etseq., concerning the forms of pleadings in equity, should be so construed as to require a reasonable degree of accuracy in complying with their requirements.</p> <p>Where the paragraphs of a bill in equity are wrongly numbered and more than one subject-matter contained in a single paragraph, a demurrer to the bill should not on that account be allowed, but the proper method of objecting to defects of this character is by motion in the nature of a ne recipiatur.</p> <p>A bill setting forth an agreement between plaintiff and defendant, by which the former was to loan money on mortgages for the latter, examine titles, etc., and to divide commissions, and enumerating a number of instances in which it was alleged that the defendant had failed to comply with the agreement, is not multifarious.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • city lacked authority to interfere with power over court personnel incidental to state grant of jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Bryan, Fowler, McSherry, Roberts, Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.