Chew v. Flint

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion for summary judgment because a trier of fact could find substantial assistance or encouragement under a theory of respondeat superior
• “Beginning with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision [in Skipworth, 690 A.2d at 173-74] . . . Pennsylvania courts have allowed claims for the provision of substantial assistance or encouragement to another tortfeaser.”
• “[I]n [Skipworth] the court endorsed § 876(a) of the Second Restatement’s ‘concert of action’ theory[.]”
• “Pennsylvania law now recognizes a civil claim for aiding and abetting fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).