Chevy Chase Dairy, Inc. v. Mullineaux

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, “[t]herefore, Plaintiff must show that two (2) or more Board members retaliated against him . . . .”
• “If a majority of defendants prove that their individual votes against the plaintiff would have been the same . . ., the defendants . . . cannot be held liable . . . because causation is absent . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).