Skip to main content
· 10/20/1998

Chevy Chase Bank FSB v. Kukuk (In Re Kukuk)

Citations

  • 225 B.R. 778
  • 15 Colo. Bankr. Ct. Rep. 396
  • 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1345
  • 1998 WL 730175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “a misrepresentation is fraudulent only if the maker ‘knows or believes that the matter is not what he represents it to be’ ”
  • holding that misrepresentation includes an implied representation regarding a debtor’s intent to perform under a credit card agreement when the card is used
  • suggesting that an accurate analysis of a § 523(a)(2)(A) cause of action begins with the Restatement rather than the five point test set forth in Fowler Bros. v. Young (In re Young), 91 F.3d 1367, 1373 (10th Cir.1996)
  • describing postagreement nonperformance, standing alone, does not demonstrate fraudulent intent at inception
  • “A finding regarding fraudulent intent, therefore, will be determined on a case-by-case basis, with the ... demeanor and credibility of the witness playing a very large role.”
  • fraudulent nature of representation separate from intent to deceive to influence conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Pearson, and Robinson, Bankruptcy Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.