Chevron Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that incorporation by reference of the UNCITRAL rules constitutes clear and unmistakable evidence that the parties agreed to arbitrate arbitrability
• holding that the parties’ incorporation of UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules constitutes clear and unmistakable evidence that the parties intended for an arbitrator to decide issues of arbitrability
• holding that the parties’ incorporation of UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules constitutes clear and unmistakable evidence that the parties intended for an arbitrator to decide issues of arbitrability
• finding that “the existence of an award is a factual question that the District Court must resolve in order to maintain jurisdiction”
• stating that a plaintiff satisfies its burden of production under the FSIA’s arbitration exception by producing the arbitration agreement and the resulting arbitral award
• finding that a sovereign’s challenge to arbitrability “conflates the jurisdictional standard of the FSIA with the standard for review under the New York Convention”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).