Chevron Corp. v. Berlinger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the federal reporter’s privilege is “intended to protect the public’s interest in being informed by ‘a vigorous, aggressive and independent press’”
• finding that the footage could provide “unimpeachably objective evidence” of Plaintiffs’ improperly influencing expert witnesses and a foreign government
• “This circuit has long recognized a qualified evidentiary privilege for information gathered in a journalistic investigation. [This privilege] is intended to protect the public’s interest in being informed by ‘a vigorous, aggressive and independent press[.]’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).