Chevron Chemical Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that alpha olefin fraction exported from the United States was “unfinished” and that the French processing was intermediate processing because the returned article contained benzene rings that the exported fraction did not contain
• holding that alpha olefin fraction exported from the United States was “unfinished” and that manufacturing in France was intermediate processing, not an alteration, because the product did not contain the benzene rings that the final product, alkylbenzene sulfonic acids, contained
• stating that “[a]n eo nomine provision that names an article without terms of limitation, absent evidence of a contrary legislative intent, is deemed to include all forms of the article.”
• stating that “[a]n eo nomine provision that names an article without terms of limitation, absent evidence of a contrary legislative intent, is deemed to include all forms of the article”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).