Skip to main content
· 12/13/1993

Chevalier v. Animal Rehabilitation Center, Inc.

Citations

  • 839 F. Supp. 1224
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17758
  • 1993 WL 521822

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that McDonald, “rather than the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, [is] 8 instructive” on the issue of alleged defamation that occurred during the petitioning and in 9 publications inducing the petitioning
  • relying on McDonald to conclude that, because the Noerr-Pennington doctrine relies on the First Amendment's right to petition, that clause \poses no barrier\ to a defamation claim \so long as the added safeguard of actual malice is in place\
  • declining to extend Noerr-Pennington immunity to defamation claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kendall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.