Skip to main content
· 3/9/2010

Cheuk Fung S-Yong v. Holder

Citations

  • 600 F.3d 1028
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 4900
  • 2010 WL 891291

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \We have previously found that California law regulates the possession and sale of many substances that are not regulated by the [federal Controlled Substances Act]\
  • “We have previously found that California law regulates the possession and sale of many substances that are not regulated by the [federal Controlled Substances Act]”
  • “We have previously found that California law regulates the possession and sale of many substances that are not regulated by the [federal] CSA.”
  • 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C) restricts review of final orders of removal based on certain enumerated crimes, including controlled substance offenses, but the court retains jurisdiction where the petition raises constitutional claims or questions of law
  • when alien’s admissions in pleading stage are not sufficient to establish removability and modified categorical approach must be applied, alien’s statements to the immigration judge after the pleading stage regarding the nature of his criminal conduct may not be considered
  • addressing conviction for transporting and attempting to transport controlled' substance's

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Pregerson, Hawkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.