Chet Adams Co. v. James F. Pederson Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the defendant waived its right to complain the plaintiff lacked the capacity to sue for failing to comply with section 33-15-102 because the defendant did not timely raise the defense
• holding the failure of a foreign corporation to obtain a certificate of authority prior to bringing an action to recover monies owed on an account affected the corporation’s capacity to sue but did not affect the court’s subject matter jurisdiction
• indicating an appellant waives his right to complain on an issue raised for the first time in his reply brief
• “[T]he defense of capacity to sue can be waived by a defendant if not raised.”
• \[T]he defense of capacity to sue can be waived by a defendant if not raised.\
• “[Compliance with this [closed door] statute affects a foreign corporation’s capacity to sue[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).