Chestnut v. Tracy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an additional insured is not a party to an insurance policy
• noting that the policy excluded suits arising from Bodily Injury brought by “ ‘(1) An ‘employee’ of the named insured arising out of and in the course of: (a) Employment by the named insured; or (b) Performing duties related to the conduct of the named insured’s business[.]’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).