Chester R. Robinson and Wife, Frances Earline Robinson, and Roy K. Ewart and David B. Black v. The National Cash Register Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a party’s “persistence in litigating [a claim] when res judicata clearly barred the suit violated rule 11”
• a party's \persistence in litigating [a claim] when res judicata clearly barred the suit violated rule 11\
• “the filing of successive motions, each of which is individually well founded in fact and law, could under various circumstances constitute an improper purpose under Rule 11”
• a party’s “persistence in litigating [a claim] when res judicata clearly barred the suit violated rule 11”
• a party’s “persistence in litigating [a claim] when res judicata clearly barred the suit violated rule 11”
• “By employing the word “shall” the drafters intended to stress the mandatory imposition of sanctions when the requirements of Rule 11 have been violated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).