Skip to main content
· 10/18/1996

Chester MARKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Geri SOLCUM; Terri Solcum, Defendants-Appellees

Citations

  • 98 F.3d 494
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7702
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 12713
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27219
  • 1996 WL 598258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that amended section 1915(e)(2) \merely affects the ability of prisoners to maintain appeals in forma pauperis\
  • holding that “three strikes” provision is merely procedural and raises no retroactivity concerns
  • sua sponte determining that prisoner's complaint fails to state a claim, and dismissing appeal pursuant to S 1915(e)(2)
  • “section 1915(e)(2) is a procedural rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beezer, Kozinski, Kleinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.