Skip to main content
· 9/20/2005

Chester A. Lauth v. Daniel L. McCollum

Citations

  • 424 F.3d 631
  • 23 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 859
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 20099
  • 2005 WL 2277119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Animus thus comes into play only when, no rational reason or motive being imaginable for the injurious action taken by the defendant against the plaintiff, the action would be inexplicable unless animus had motivated it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Posner, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.