CHESTEL THORSON v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We hold that, on the record before the district court, 13 USCA4 Appeal: 25-4012 Doc: 44 Filed: 04/06/2026 Pg: 14 of 15 [the] [s]pecial [c]ondition . . . isn’t ‘reasonably related.’”
• providing standard of review for § 3583(e)(2) motion
• providing standard of review for § 3583(e)(2) motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).