Skip to main content
· 1/12/2010

Chest v. State

Citations

  • 922 N.E.2d 621
  • 2009 WL 5865372

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that intrusion into defendant’s ordinary activities was “minimal” because the search occurred at night and involved a vehicle that did not belong to defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Darden, Mathias, Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.