· 1/12/2010
Chest v. State
Citations
- 922 N.E.2d 621
- 2009 WL 5865372
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that intrusion into defendant’s ordinary activities was “minimal” because the search occurred at night and involved a vehicle that did not belong to defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Darden, Mathias, Robb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.