Cheslek v. Gillette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While the [available] testimony . . . may not satisfy the statute of frauds for the grant of an easement, it is sufficient to show an attempted grant, thereby dispelling the argument that the use of the driveway was permissive” and helping establish the adverse use element.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).