Chesbrough v. VPA, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Medicare does not require compliance with an industry standard as a prerequisite to payment”
• stating that claims must assert “ ‘(1) the time, place, and content of the alleged misrepresentation,’ (2
• stating that liability exists when a medical contractor “[seeks] reimbursement for services that it knew were not just of poor quality but had no medical value”
• recognizing that presentment is not required under § 3729(a)(7)
• stating that claims must assert “ ‘(1) the time, place, and content of the alleged misrepresentation,’ (2) ‘the fraudulent scheme,’ (3) the defendant’s fraudulent intent, and (4) the resulting injury”
• explaining the “need to plead a connection between the. alleged fraud and an actual .claim made to .the government”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).