Skip to main content
· 5/18/1993

Chesapeake Ship Propeller Co. v. Stickney

Citations

  • 820 F. Supp. 995
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6676
  • 1993 WL 168606

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[t]his Court does not find Quesada, which has been negatively treated by several federal courts, compelling”
  • erosion caused by flood water build-up in drainage ditch held not to be “flood-related erosion” under the SFIP

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.