Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Barnes' Admr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordering the Commission on remand to explain finding in the context of the business cycle and providing that “the Commission may make additional determinations . . . as are necessary to account for such explanations”
• “A correlation analysis entails tracking subject import trends in relation to trends in the domestic industry’s performance and the court has approved its use to assess the price effects of subject imports.”
• “[T]his court, reviewing under the substantial evidence standard, must defer to the [Commerce].”
• “The statute gives the Commission ample discretion to decide whether to discount evidence due to petition-induced volume changes. In this case, the agency provided a reasonable explanation for its decision not to discount the interim 2012 data.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).