· 3/1/1926

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.

Citations

270 U.S. 260
46 S. Ct. 220
70 L. Ed. 576
1926 U.S. LEXIS 890

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“spotting service” included in “line-haul” tariffs; extra charge for performing service illegal; apparently no separately stated express “spotting service” tariff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brandeis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.