Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Warnock's Administrator

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that where a genuine dispute of material fact exists with regards to an employee’s FLSA exempt status summary judgment cannot be granted on Ohio’s wage and hour recordkeeping requirements
• stating that where an employee’s regular rate of pay is determined by dividing the weekly wage by the number of hours actually worked in a particular week, “the employer will owe [the employee] only one-half of the regular rate for those hours”
• stating that where an employee’s regular rate of pay is determined by dividing the weekly wage by the number of hours actually worked in a particular week, “the employer will owe [the employee] only one-half of the regular rate for those hours”
• denying summary judgment for the plaintiff on the issue of misclassification because there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether certain exemptions did not apply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).