Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Salyers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that provision of the BLM's wild horse handbook requiring population inventories every two years did not create \a legal duty\ for BLM
• recognizing that emotional distress might rise to irreparable harm where the claimed injury is observing the killing of a large number of animals
• holding that tiering to a previously compiled removal analysis was sufficient to justify a new removal where BLM 'concluded that the environmental impacts from the proposed removal were not substain-tially different from those evaluated in the previous analysis
• distinguishing Fund for 25 Animals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).