Skip to main content
· 3/24/1975

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Paynter

Citations

  • 420 U.S. 997
  • 95 S. Ct. 1438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Acknowledging district court's authority to entertain motion to dismiss where legal issues raised and could be determined without trial on general issue, and operative facts were undisputed
  • affirming the district court’s dismissal of an indictment when “undisputed extrinsic evidence” demonstrated that “the government was, as a matter of law, incapable of proving” an element of the offense
  • affirming dismissal of all but 15 counts of a 560-count indictment where defendant had asserted entrapment by estoppel in a pretrial motion to dismiss and the government had conceded the facts were not in dispute
  • notice of Federal agency approval of contemplated actions sufficient when received indirectly
  • notice of Federal agency approval of contemplated actions sufficient when received indirectly
  • after Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Consideration, Took

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.