Skip to main content
· 11/25/1929

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Mihas

Citations

  • 280 U.S. 102
  • 50 S. Ct. 42
  • 74 L. Ed. 207
  • 1929 U.S. LEXIS 451

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Had plaintiff been entitled -to notice, defendant’s act in lacking in the cars without warning might have been negligence irrespective'of the force of the contact.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sutherland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.