· 11/25/1929
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Mihas
Citations
- 280 U.S. 102
- 50 S. Ct. 42
- 74 L. Ed. 207
- 1929 U.S. LEXIS 451
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Had plaintiff been entitled -to notice, defendant’s act in lacking in the cars without warning might have been negligence irrespective'of the force of the contact.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sutherland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.