· 3/23/1923
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. McMath's Administrator
Citations
- 198 Ky. 390
- 248 S.W. 1051
- 1923 Ky. LEXIS 481
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing case because plaintiff did not bring a claim pertaining to redactions, even when plaintiff had referenced “heavy redactions[,]” because plaintiff “did not ask the court to do anything about those redactions” (emphasis added)
- identifying no “broader policy or practice of delaying disclosure”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.