Skip to main content
· 3/23/1923

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. McMath's Administrator

Citations

  • 198 Ky. 390
  • 248 S.W. 1051
  • 1923 Ky. LEXIS 481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing case because plaintiff did not bring a claim pertaining to redactions, even when plaintiff had referenced “heavy redactions[,]” because plaintiff “did not ask the court to do anything about those redactions” (emphasis added)
  • identifying no “broader policy or practice of delaying disclosure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.