Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Laney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]he Court finds that even where relevant evidence has been solicited by the claimant or her representative, that is not reason enough to warrant ignoring such evidence”
• an ALJ is required to support her explanations with “sufficiently specific” evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).