Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Kelly's Administratrix

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a similar motion in limine regarding a Certificate of Innocence
• court suggesting that “[t]he parties should stipulate that the [underlying criminal] proceedings were terminated in [plaintiff’s] favor”
• “evidence that [plaintiff] did commit the crime may also be admitted because it may be necessary for the jury to decide whether Kluppelberg likely committed the crime in order to decide whether the alleged wrongdoing of the defendant caused him injury and, if so, the extent of damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).