Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Hudson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the ALJ's reliance on only one past job as past relevant work
• “[T]he ALJ's finding that Plaintiff could perform [her] past relevant work . . . as generally performed is sufficient to negate a finding of disability at step four[;] it is not necessary for the Court to determine whether Plaintiff could perform her past relevant work as actually performed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).