Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Hogg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that a finding of “willful infringement supports an award of attorneys’ fees to a prevailing plaintiff”
• noting that a case might be exceptional if it were “so devoid of legal merit that one could only conclude that [it was] advanced with an improper motive” (cleaned up)
• approving hourly rates of $675 for partners, $325-$505 for associates, and $200 for support staff
• approving of similar hourly rates for attorneys in a Copyright Act suit in this District and collecting cases in support of these rates’ reasonableness
• approving of similar hourly rates for attorneys in a Copyright Act suit in this District and collecting cases in support of these rates’ reasonableness
• approving of similar hourly rates for attorneys in a Copyright Act suit in this District and collecting cases in support of these rates’ reasonableness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).