Skip to main content
· 8/30/1993

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's

Citations

  • 834 F. Supp. 456
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the language requiring consent is unambiguous and does not create an unconditional duty to defend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stanley S. Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.