Skip to main content
· 2/12/1924

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Bradford

Citations

  • 202 Ky. 26
  • 258 S.W. 939
  • 1924 Ky. LEXIS 661

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a plaintiff is ”, “barred from obtaining a duplicative remedy under ERISA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.